Forums New posts Search forums. What's new New posts New profile posts New threadmarks Latest activity. Members Registered members Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. Log in Register.
Search titles only. Word Count:. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. Install the app. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. Thread starter peterpandude85 Start date Aug 19, Click to expand The big question here is also the most simple question.
They were at the short end of the technological, manufacturing, manpower and basically everything else stick compared to the West. Literally short of the USA getting devastated by a meteor storm, the Japanese couldn't win. CV N This could play out if USA was never dragged into the war with only Japan in the first place- ie.
Pearl Harbor not attacked so the Pacific War is pretty much separate from the European affair. CalBear Moderator. Monthly Donor. This in turn gives Japan more time to secure it's lost territory and effectively knock China out of the war doesn't conquer it, just makes it a non threat through additional Ichi-Go offensives.
Not only that but if the US is entirely focused on defeating Germany without Soviet help, the Japanese navy can focus on anti-submarine warfare and securing it's supply lines.
